capital is the lubricant, the mission is the machine
two food founders told me money greases the machine but the mission is the machine. why the investors who share your why are the ones who stay.
monday morning i taped an episode with two founders in hong kong who make milk out of a desert crop.
not a nut. a small tuber that grows in dry ground with far less water than most crops. they blend it with soy and oats, pull the sweetness out with an enzyme process instead of adding sugar, and sell it in stores. the crop gets grown on land that used to be desert, and they told me it rebuilds the soil so other crops can follow.
that's a product with a story built in. most founders would kill for it.
but the part i want you to hear came at the end, when i asked what raising money for a food company had taught them about the investor they want next.
capital is the lubricant. yes, very important. but... mission is more important
i hear the opposite all the time. founders who'd take a check from anyone. founders who treat the investor list like a phone book and the raise like a numbers game. and some of it is a numbers game. you do need volume to find the people who say yes.
but who you let in matters more than how many say yes.
here's why i think they're right.
a food brand going overseas needs a lot more than money. it needs distribution partners in each market. it needs someone who knows how a retailer in that country decides what goes on the shelf. it needs patience, because new flavors and new markets don't move on a venture timeline. an investor who only brings cash will be the first one asking why the numbers aren't moving yet.
an investor who shares the mission brings the other stuff. the intro. the farm tech contact. the distributor they had dinner with last month. and the patience, because they care about the same outcome you do.
that's what they meant by lubricant. money makes the machine run smoother. it isn't the machine.
the other thing i noticed... they sell a plant milk on a crowded shelf. oat, almond, soy, all of it, right next to theirs. and they didn't lead with the awards or the lab. they led with who it's for. people who can't drink dairy, which they said is a huge share of asia. children. older people. coffee shops that need something that foams.
that's the same move in fundraising. you don't lead with what you are. you lead with who it's for and why they care. the mission does the filtering for you. the investors who light up at that story are the ones you want. the ones who only ask about the multiple are telling you something too.
if you're raising right now, try this. write down the one sentence about why your company exists that has nothing to do with money. then go down your target list and ask which of these people would care about that sentence even if the returns were average.
those are your first calls.
and when you get on the call, ask them what you'd ask a distributor. what have you done for the last company like mine? an investor who shares the mission will answer with names and stories. the others will talk about market size.
long term, the investors who stay with you through the hard years are the ones who signed up for the mission. the ones who signed up for the spreadsheet leave when the spreadsheet does.
if you want help building a raise around the right people instead of everyone with a checkbook, that's how i approach fundraising strategy.
so look at your cap table... how many of those names would still pick up your call if money got tight?
the machine economy brief
one email when it matters: bitcoin, ai, robotics, and what founders should do about it. unsubscribe anytime.