ten thousand agents, and your sample size of one
a swarm of agents ground on one math problem for eighty-eight hours and you gave your own distribution a single try.
ten thousand agents ran for eighty-eight hours and came back with a proof.
openai says that swarm produced a blowup result for the forced navier-stokes equations, formalized in lean so machines could check it. within hours the fight started over who deserved the credit.
everyone argued about the credit. almost nobody sat with the number.
ten thousand. eighty-eight hours. a problem people have circled for a century and the thing that moved it was not one genius having a moment... it was volume, pointed at one question, for four days without sleeping.
i ran a webinar this week with about thirty founders on it.
one of them has what you are told to want. finished product, paying customers, happy ones, a category with no real incumbent.
he tried to go get more once. hired an agency, video, cold outreach, the whole package. nothing came back.
so he stopped. and now he is raising, and when i asked what the money was for, the answer was marketing.
one attempt. one conclusion. a whole year of behaviour built on a sample size of one.
you knocked on a single door, nobody answered, and you decided the street was empty.
here is the flip. you think demand is a puzzle you solve with a better idea. its a search problem, and search rewards the one who can run the loop a thousand times without flinching.
my own numbers, since i will not borrow somebody elses. our fleet pushed 121,811 emails and got 139 replies back before we tore the message up and started over.
thats an embarrassing rate. its also a rate, which means it has a direction and it can move. his has no rate at all, just one invoice and a feeling.
if he raises on that feeling, he buys the same feeling at a bigger price.
and notice what the credit fight was about. the machine did the grinding, and the humans still went to war over whose name sits on it, because the work is the machine and the relationship never was.
thats the shape of the thing we run at gtm. we hold the technology and the service, you hold every conversation and every relationship that comes out of it, and nobody here promises you a result.
long term this is the whole game. the founders still standing in ten years wont be the ones who guessed right, they will be the ones who could afford to be wrong nine hundred times in a row and keep the loop running.
so how many doors did you knock on, before you told yourself the street was empty?
the machine economy brief
one email when it matters: bitcoin, ai, robotics, and what founders should do about it. unsubscribe anytime.